| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
…and time is previous. Since I could reproduce it and see it working
with the steps provided in the comment:
https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/1009#issuecomment-623008816
I think it's good for now. We also assume there won't be a regression.
|
|
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #1002
|
|
|
|
|
|
[skip CI]
|
|
permissions…
…and I don't really see the benefit given the state of this project
|
|
|
|
mode we are in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See if we can get away from Travis, as github actions is faster and easier to use and…works much better in China.
|
|
subdirectory"
This reverts commit eb792ea76888970d486323df07105129abbbe466.
Seems to break CI
Related to #1000
|
|
[skip CI]
|
|
subdirectory
This will work for default git object databases only, which use git as
object database directly.
Related to #1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Chenxiong Qi <qcxhome@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #943
|
|
Fixes #774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And directly use coverage.py
|
|
And directly use coverage.py
|
|
|
|
|