| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
figured out that the implementation really should be specific to the git command. This leaves the interface open for other implemntations which use a different way to provide feedback (as we do not make assumptions about the format of a feedback line)
|
|
similar functionality as used by the fetch, push and pull methods
|
|
consolidation changes from master to make clone use the same facilities
|
|
This could cause several copies to exist, and makes the cmd implementation a bad choice if big files are involved
|
|
the test suggests. Pure python implementation still has some trouble, but this should be very fixable
|
|
of the new database types. This reduces code duplication to the mere minimum, but allows custom tests to be added on top easily and flexibly
|
|
implementations. It seems theoretically work together now, although it clearly is much more complex than ever before.
The repo package was slimmed down to being a module once again, which is only there for compatability actually
|
