| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Needs plenty of work
|
|
figured out that the implementation really should be specific to the git command. This leaves the interface open for other implemntations which use a different way to provide feedback (as we do not make assumptions about the format of a feedback line)
|
|
consolidation changes from master to make clone use the same facilities
|
|
git command. everything else was moved to GitDB. None of the tests is yet expected to run, although git-python should have less trouble getting the tests back up running than GitDB. plenty of code needs to be de-duplicated though in case of the tests, which will be some work
|
|
implementation, including related types. It doesn't yet work, and the omnipresence of the repo imposes a problem right now, as the required ref functionality is not yet part of the gitdb specification. theoretically, the whole ref implementation has to move into gitdb
|
|
remote: Fixed bug that was caused by the unchecked deletion of an uncached attribute which did not necessarily exist
|
|
|
|
adjusted
|
