From f5d11b750ecc982541d1f936488248f0b42d75d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antoine Musso Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:15:50 +0100 Subject: pep8 linting (whitespaces) W191 indentation contains tabs E221 multiple spaces before operator E222 multiple spaces after operator E225 missing whitespace around operator E271 multiple spaces after keyword W292 no newline at end of file W293 blank line contains whitespace W391 blank line at end of file --- git/test/performance/test_utils.py | 40 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) (limited to 'git/test/performance/test_utils.py') diff --git a/git/test/performance/test_utils.py b/git/test/performance/test_utils.py index 8637af48..7de77970 100644 --- a/git/test/performance/test_utils.py +++ b/git/test/performance/test_utils.py @@ -9,29 +9,29 @@ from lib import ( class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): - + def test_access(self): # compare dict vs. slot access class Slotty(object): __slots__ = "attr" def __init__(self): self.attr = 1 - + class Dicty(object): def __init__(self): self.attr = 1 - + class BigSlotty(object): __slots__ = ('attr', ) + tuple('abcdefghijk') def __init__(self): for attr in self.__slots__: setattr(self, attr, 1) - + class BigDicty(object): def __init__(self): for attr in BigSlotty.__slots__: setattr(self, attr, 1) - + ni = 1000000 for cls in (Slotty, Dicty, BigSlotty, BigDicty): cli = cls() @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): elapsed = time() - st print >> sys.stderr, "Accessed %s.attr %i times in %s s ( %f acc / s)" % (cls.__name__, ni, elapsed, ni / elapsed) # END for each class type - + # check num of sequence-acceses for cls in (list, tuple): x = 10 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): na = ni * 3 print >> sys.stderr, "Accessed %s[x] %i times in %s s ( %f acc / s)" % (cls.__name__, na, elapsed, na / elapsed) # END for each sequence - + def test_instantiation(self): ni = 100000 max_num_items = 4 @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): print >> sys.stderr, "Created %i %ss of size %i in %f s ( %f inst / s)" % (ni, cls.__name__, mni, elapsed, ni / elapsed) # END for each type # END for each item count - + # tuple and tuple direct st = time() for i in xrange(ni): @@ -91,19 +91,19 @@ class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): # END for each item elapsed = time() - st print >> sys.stderr, "Created %i tuples (1,2,3,4) in %f s ( %f tuples / s)" % (ni, elapsed, ni / elapsed) - + st = time() for i in xrange(ni): t = tuple((1,2,3,4)) # END for each item elapsed = time() - st print >> sys.stderr, "Created %i tuples tuple((1,2,3,4)) in %f s ( %f tuples / s)" % (ni, elapsed, ni / elapsed) - + def test_unpacking_vs_indexing(self): ni = 1000000 list_items = [1,2,3,4] tuple_items = (1,2,3,4) - + for sequence in (list_items, tuple_items): st = time() for i in xrange(ni): @@ -111,14 +111,14 @@ class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): # END for eac iteration elapsed = time() - st print >> sys.stderr, "Unpacked %i %ss of size %i in %f s ( %f acc / s)" % (ni, type(sequence).__name__, len(sequence), elapsed, ni / elapsed) - + st = time() for i in xrange(ni): one, two, three, four = sequence[0], sequence[1], sequence[2], sequence[3] # END for eac iteration elapsed = time() - st print >> sys.stderr, "Unpacked %i %ss of size %i individually in %f s ( %f acc / s)" % (ni, type(sequence).__name__, len(sequence), elapsed, ni / elapsed) - + st = time() for i in xrange(ni): one, two = sequence[0], sequence[1] @@ -126,14 +126,14 @@ class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): elapsed = time() - st print >> sys.stderr, "Unpacked %i %ss of size %i individually (2 of 4) in %f s ( %f acc / s)" % (ni, type(sequence).__name__, len(sequence), elapsed, ni / elapsed) # END for each sequence - + def test_large_list_vs_iteration(self): # what costs more: alloc/realloc of lists, or the cpu strain of iterators ? def slow_iter(ni): for i in xrange(ni): yield i # END slow iter - be closer to the real world - + # alloc doesn't play a role here it seems for ni in (500, 1000, 10000, 20000, 40000): st = time() @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): # END for each item elapsed = time() - st print >> sys.stderr, "Iterated %i items from list in %f s ( %f acc / s)" % (ni, elapsed, ni / elapsed) - + st = time() for i in slow_iter(ni): i @@ -150,14 +150,14 @@ class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): elapsed = time() - st print >> sys.stderr, "Iterated %i items from iterator in %f s ( %f acc / s)" % (ni, elapsed, ni / elapsed) # END for each number of iterations - + def test_type_vs_inst_class(self): class NewType(object): pass - + # lets see which way is faster inst = NewType() - + ni = 1000000 st = time() for i in xrange(ni): @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ class TestUtilPerformance(TestBigRepoR): # END for each item elapsed = time() - st print >> sys.stderr, "Created %i items using inst.__class__ in %f s ( %f items / s)" % (ni, elapsed, ni / elapsed) - + st = time() for i in xrange(ni): type(inst)() -- cgit v1.2.3