| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
fwd: 52% faster on Core-i7@2.6GHz, 40% faster on GCE Xeon@2GHz
inv: 24% faster on Core-i7@2.6GHz, 36% faster on GCE Xeon@2GHz
Those speed-ups are obtained due to elimination of a number of
transcendental functions (atan, sincos, cosh, sinh), through the
use of usual trigonometric/hyperbolic formulas.
The numeric results before/after seem identical at worse up to
14 decimal digits, which is way beyond the apparent accuracy of the
computations
On a point, far from central meridian, where round-tripping is not so great:
Before:
echo "81 1" | src/proj -d 18 +proj=utm +zone=31 | src/proj -d 18 -I +proj=utm +zone=31
80.999994286593448578 0.999987970918421620
After:
$ echo "81 1" | src/proj -d 18 +proj=utm +zone=31 | src/proj -d 18 -I +proj=utm +zone=31
80.999994286593448578 0.999987970918422175
The benchmarking program used is:
```
#include "proj.h"
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
if( argc != 3 ) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: bench quoted_proj_string fwd/inv\n");
exit(1);
}
PJ* p = proj_create(0, argv[1]);
const int dir = strcmp(argv[2], "inv") == 0 ? PJ_INV : PJ_FWD;
PJ_COORD coord;
if( dir == PJ_FWD )
{
coord.xy.x = 0.5; // rad
coord.xy.y = 0.5; // rad
}
else
{
coord.xy.x = 450000; // m
coord.xy.y = 5000000; // m
}
for(int i = 0; i < 40 * 1000* 1000; i++)
proj_trans(p, dir, coord);
proj_destroy(p);
return 0;
}
```
|
|
Updated appveyor to not copy DLL & update existing vcpkg
|
|
rouault/projections_remove_assignments_in_expressions
src/projections/: remove assignments in expression and multiple statements per line
|
|
|
|
per line
Should hopefully result in no change in results, and hopefully more
readable code...
|
|
functional impact)
|
|
|
|
|
|
WKT import/export: add support for WKT1_ESRI VERTCS syntax
|
|
|
|
Add some more missing methods and notes to esri projection mapping
|
|
|
|
Transverse_Cylindrical_Equal_Area projections (#2020)
* Add mapping of ESRI projection methods Mercator_Variant_A, Mercator_Variant_C
and Transverse_Cylindrical_Equal_Area
* Add a few notes about missing mappings
|
|
+no_defs and +datum has no effect on the behaviour of proj, so can be
left out in these examples in the docs. +no_defs in rare occasions would
have had an effect in older PROJ versions but not from PROJ 6 and
onwards. +datum has ever only been honoured by cs2cs and pj_transform().
Fixes #2017
|
|
Map the Behrman projection to cae when converting ESRI CRSes
|
|
|
|
while mapping ESRI projections, and map the Behrman projection to
cae with lat_ts=30, lon_0=0
|
|
|
|
Removes section about proj-datumgrid-* packages in favour for a section
about the PROJ-data package and the CDN.
|
|
(#2011)
Fixes https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2290 where it was found that
PROJ returned value for conversion factor of US Survey Foot unit wasn't
at the maximum resolution, but only accurate to 15 significant digits.
|
|
Follow PDAL's CMake RPATH strategy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affects output of 'proj -l'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+nadgrids= and +pm= (#1998)
Fixes issue reported at
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2020-February/051749.html
The generated pipeline assumes that the input coordinates for the grid transformation
were related to the non-Greenwich based datum, so we must compensate for that and
add logic to go back to Greenwich.
|
|
-DSQLITE_OMIT_AUTOINIT (fixes #1932) (#1997)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #1984
- Copy BETA2007.gsb, MD, alaska, conus, ntf_r93.gsb, ntv1_can.dat grids
from proj-datumgrid to data/tests.
- Replace a couple uses of nzgd2kgrid0005.gsb in tests by ntf_r93.gsb
- Add downsampled/subsetted versions of egm96_15.gtx as tests/egm96_15_downsampled.gtx
and ntv2_0.gsb as tests/ntv2_0_downsampled.gsb
This results in a few changes in expected results
- Simpify travis/install.sh due to less configurations to test
This results in a hopefully acceptable increase of the proj-X.Y.Z.tar.gz
from 2.9 to 5.3 MB
|
|
reprojecting area of use to source and target CRS
Was found with https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/1989
when using cs2cs EPSG:4937 EPSG:31258+5778
- We do not need to do vertical transformation in that context. This failed here
because the Austrian grids have nodata value outside of the shape of Austria, so
the edges of the grids are mostly nodata values.
- And we should avoid grid-based transformations too.
|
|
Database: register 4 height Austrian grids from https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ-data/pull/13 + handle 'Vertical Offset by Grid Interpolation (BEV AT)' method
|
|
Support conversion of Flat_Polar_Quartic projection method
|
|
https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ-data/pull/13 + handle 'Vertical Offset by Grid Interpolation (BEV AT)' method
|
|
|
|
|
|
createOperations(): be robust to a GeographicCRS having a wrong ID attached to it (fixes #1982)
|
|
to it (fixes #1982)
|
|
19111
|
|
This is the consequence of a private email thread between me, Joel Haasdyk and
Roger Lott. I initially raised that the GDA2020 technical manual advertized the
Helmert transformation between GDA94 to GDA2020 to be a 3D one, with example of
a test point where ellipsoidal heights where modified. It appears this was intended.
The corresponding record in EPSG uses the EPSG:9607 "Coordinate Frame rotation (geog2D domain)"
method between the 2D geographic CRS of GDA94 and GDA2020. From the email exchange,
it appears that there's a lot of legacy explaining that Helmert transformations
are registered only between 2D CRS, which doesn't mean that when applied to the
corresponding 3D CRS, the change in ellipsoidal height should be discarded. Related
to that, the EPSG database, while it has methods flagged "(geog3D domain)" never uses them.
So... this changeset slightly ammends PROJ behaviour to ignore the "(geog2D domain)" flag,
but only consider the dimensionality of the source & target CRS. However, for a EPSG
transformation, those are always 2D CRS, hence introduce the use3DHelmert_ hack when
we know that ultimately the 'real' source & target CRS are 3D.
I wouldn't be surprised if in more complex pipeline the above logic would be lacking.
But it fixes at least simple transformations.
|
|
(refs #1973)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add alternative grid for JTSK - JTSK03 transform (EPSG:8364)
|
|
The definition of EPSG:8364 uses NADCON method for horizontal grid (.las/.los files)
but this format is not supported by PROJ.
UGKK (Slovak Geodetic and Cartographic Institute) provides NADCON .las/.los files here:
https://www.geoportal.sk/files/gz/slovakia_jtsk03_to_jtsk.zip
Additionally UGKK also provides the same grid file in NTv2 format:
https://www.geoportal.sk/files/gz/slovakia_jtsk03_to_jtsk_ntv2.zip
So let's add the NTv2 file the grid_alternatives table so that PROJ can automatically pick it up...
|
|
CMake: rename BUILD_LIBPROJ_SHARED to BUILD_SHARED_LIBS
|