| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
geog2D transformation to a geog3D
Fixes for example EPSG:4979 to EPSG:2189, as raised in
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/1972#issuecomment-548814354
|
|
Better filtering based on extent and performance improvements
|
|
a proj_create_vertical_crs_ex()
|
|
|
|
rouault/improve_transformation_with_alternative_vertical_unit_and_direction
Improve transformations with alternative vertical unit and direction
|
|
are missing, especially for compound CRS. Helps having shorter/more relevant results
|
|
functional changes
|
|
This is invalid WKT, but GDAL 2.4 used to accept it and make a reasonable
use of it...
Currently we default it to 0 which is non sensical. Better use 1 as GDAL 2.4
did, and emit a warning.
Other fix: proj_create_from_wkt() was documented to operate by default in
non-strict validation mode, but it was actually in strict mode. So do as
documented.
|
|
Height Depth Reversal and use it in createOperations()
|
|
'NAVD88 (ftUS)' to X, where we now consider the available transformations from 'NAVD88' to X that might exist in the database
|
|
functional change expected
|
|
transformations
|
|
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=18587
|
|
arbitrary number of steps (fixes #1632)
EPSG:9103 (NAD27 to ITRF2014 (1)) is now handled.
Note:EPSG:9104 (NAD27 to ITRF2014 (2)) is not currently, since it uses
for step EPSG:8861 (NAD83(HARN) to NAD83(FBN) (1))
an unsupported transformation method (NADCON5 (3D), EPSG:1075).
|
|
verticalCRS to a 2D CRS
|
|
Relates to https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/1856
|
|
When we had a transformation between a compoundCRS and a target geographicCRS,
we did not take into account that in the vertical->other_geog_CRS transformation
we used, the other_geog_CRS was an implicit interpolation CRS. Thus before
doing vertical adjustment, we must go to this interpolation CRS.
The workflow is thus:
source CRS -> interpolation CRS + vertical adjustment + interplation CRS -> target CRS
|
|
pipelines at end
|
|
createOperations(), and test it (fixes #1623)
|
|
component is a BoundCRS, do not apply the horizontal transformation twice
|
|
geographic and vertical CRS
For example when transforming from NAD83+NAVD88 height to WGS84, there
is no transformation between NAVD88 height to WGS84. In that case,
use all potential transformations from NAVD88 height to another geographic CRS
for the vertical part.
|
|
Currently very few transformations from/to WGS84 (Gxxxx) are registered
in the EPSG database, and there isn't even transformations between WGS84 EPSG:4326
and those ones. Consequently transformations to those realizations often
ended up as no-operation, whereas going through WGS84 EPSG:4326 will bring
more meaningful results. So register those EPSG:4326<-->WGS 84 (Gxxx)
null transformations, and when having WGS 84 (Gxxx) as source/target,
consider EPSG:4326 as an intermediate.
This change has no effect on the existing direct transformations
from/to WGS 84 (Gxxx).
|
|
c --> a < c), to get consistent results
|
|
Geog3D when the DB has only VertCS to Geog2D
This is needed to fix cases that would not work if using the promoteTo3D()/--3d
functionnality just added per a6e1d72890615b42f54edad9b17acff8e7623844
In some cases, the EPSG database only contains a Geographic 2D CRS (like NAD83),
without a 3D version. Consequently vertical transformations between that
Geographic CRS and a Vertical CRS are only available with a 2D CRS code
(kind of a bug in modelization by the way...). So when promoting the
Geographic 2D CRS to a 3D one, we suddenly cannot find the available
transformations any more. So in such situation, try to fallback to the
2D CRS to restore the capability to find the available transformations.
|
|
non-ISO-cosher options and towgs84/nadgrids
This actually fixes a regression introduced in PROJ 6.2.0
per 78302efb70eb4b49610cda6a60bf9ce39b82264f
that made a conversion like EPSG:4326 to "+proj=something +towgs84/+nadgrids +over +type=crs"
apply the towgs84/nadgrids operation twice.
|
|
- C API: PJ_GUESSED_WKT2_2019 is added, PJ_GUESSED_WKT2_2018 aliased to it
- C API: PJ_WKT2_2019[_SIMPLIFIED] is added, PJ_WKT2_2018[_SIMPLIFIED] alias to it
- C++ API: similarly for WKTFormatter::Convention::WKT2_2019[_SIMPLIFIED]
Those above changes should be fully backward API and ABI compatible.
projinfo changes:
- accept WKT2_2019 as value for -o switch. WKT2_2018 is still accepted (undocumented)
- output now uses 'WKT2_2019 string:', so might break scripts that would rely on that.
Other internal code references to WKT2_2018 changes to WKT2_2019, included
in tests.
|
|
+datum=NAD27 and +over, where the datum was just replaced by its ellipsoid
|
|
database (fixes #1565)
|
|
Add CRS JSON export (refs #1545)
|
|
Transformation and ConcatenatedOperation
|
|
|
|
Closes #1519
|
|
|
|
- Import scope and remarks for coordinate operations of the EPSG dataset.
Database size goes from 5.2 MB to 5.55 MB
- Add proj_get_scope() and proj_get_remarks()
|
|
|
|
|
|
vertical unit change (relates to https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/1561)
|
|
projected CRS using NAD83(2011) (fixes #1474)
|
|
ETRS89 (EPSG:4937), make sure that the vgridshift is applied first (ie on Amersfoort datum) before the hgridshift
|
|
geoidgrids
Fixes https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/2019-May/008519.html
|
|
Reduce database size
|
|
|
|
return if the intersection of the areas is empty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doing geog2D<-->geog3D conversions of same datum
Seen when testing transformations between "CR 05" (EPSG:5365) and "CR-SIRGAS" (EPSG:8907)
which require going through their corresponding 3D GeogCRS to find a Helmert
transformation.
|
|
intermediate IDs (fixes #1343)
|
|
createOperations(): improve BoundCRS<-->non-bound-CRS case
|