| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
(fixes #2603)
|
|
This will help getting more consistent results between the 2D and 3D
cases, as identified in
https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/2587#issue-836061171
|
|
|
|
|
|
from BoundCRS of projected CRS based on NTF Paris to BoundCRS of geog CRS NTF Paris. Fixes https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/3273
|
|
as CompoundCRS with a VerticalCRS being an ellipsoidal height, which is
not conformant. But needed for LAS 1.4 that only supports WKT1
|
|
it work when comparing easting,northing,up and northing,easting,up
|
|
comparing to a DerivedGeographicCRS/DerivedGeodeticCRS
|
|
built from EPSG code or WKT1
Related to https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/3144
|
|
find a corresponding ellipsoidal vertical datum
|
|
ellipsoidal height is found
|
|
GEOGCS[...],VERTCS[...]
|
|
export to WKT1:ESRI
|
|
whose result is not in the DB but whose horiz and vertical parts are known
|
|
'ellipsoid height' as name and 'h' as abbreviation
|
|
Update to EPSG 10.003 and make code base robust to dealing with WKT CRS with DatumEnsemble
|
|
```
$ projinfo EPSG:32631 --3d
WKT2:2019 string:
PROJCRS["WGS 84 / UTM zone 31N",
[ ...snip ]
REMARK["Promoted to 3D from EPSG:32631"]]
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
verticalCRS/compoundCRS such as EPSG:4326+5773 and EPSG:4326+3855
|
|
2007 to WGS84 issues) (fixes #2356)
- We make createBoundCRSToWGS84IfPossible() more restrictive. If there are more
than one Helmert transformation from the CRS to WGS 84 covering the area of
use of the CRS, we do not create a BoundCRS / +towgs84
- In createOperations() filtering, we are less aggressive in discarding operations
that have the same area of use but worse accuracy. We do it only if they involve
more transformation steps.
We now get:
```
$ projinfo EPSG:5340 -o PROJ
PROJ.4 string:
+proj=longlat +ellps=GRS80 +no_defs +type=crs
$ projinfo -s EPSG:5340 -t EPSG:4326 --spatial-test intersects --summary
Candidate operations found: 2
EPSG:9264, POSGAR 2007 to WGS 84 (2), 0.5 m, Argentina
EPSG:5351, POSGAR 2007 to WGS 84 (1), 1.0 m, Argentina
```
|
|
RSPS2000)
Fixes #2254
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/36111
|
|
and non metre units (contributes to fixes #2232)
|
|
|
|
exporting it back as such (on the same object) (fixes #2228)
|
|
Make projinfo --3d --boundcrs-to-wgs84 better work (fixes #2202)
|
|
|
|
|
|
'LKS92_Latvia_TM' name, and other cleanups/improvements (fixes #2214)
|
|
|
|
* Allow importing EPSG:{horizontal_code}+{geographic_code} and
turn it into valid Geographic 3D or Projected 3D CRS internally
* Allow importing WKT1 COMPD_CS[] with above structure
* On an object imported that way, allow exporting to WKT1_GDAL,
with this non-standard structure of a horizontal CRS + geographic CRS
|
|
equal to a ESRI alias (fixes #2099)
|
|
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2347)
|
|
representation of EPSG:2193
Adresses https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2303 by raising the
identification confidence from 25% to 90% (90% means equivalent for
all purposes, but name not strictly the EPSG official one)
|
|
|
|
+nadgrids= and +pm= (#1998)
Fixes issue reported at
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2020-February/051749.html
The generated pipeline assumes that the input coordinates for the grid transformation
were related to the non-Greenwich based datum, so we must compensate for that and
add logic to go back to Greenwich.
|
|
19111
|
|
to units
Fixes bug reported in https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2020-January/051481.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(fixes #1801)
Fix for
```
projinfo --identify "+proj=utm +zone=48 +a=6377276.345 +b=6356075.41314024 +towgs84=198,881,317,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs +type=crs"
```
to only return BoundCRS of EPSG:3148: 70 %
Previously it also returned EPSG:23948 and EPSG:24048 whose projected CRS-only
parts where likely matches, but those 2 CRSs don't have a +towgs84=198,881,317,0,0,0,0,
so discard them.
|
|
|
|
and EPSG:32761 "WGS 84 / UPS South (N,E)"
Fixes https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/33077
|
|
Add proj_create_derived_geographic_crs() and proj_create_conversion_pole_rotation_grib_convention() to address GRIB datasets using a pole rotation method
|
|
|
|
not mess the derivingConversion object of the original object (fixes #1736)
normalizeForVisualization(), promoteTo3D(), demoteTo2D(), alterGeodeticCRS(),
alterCSLinearUnit() and alterParametersLinearUnit() all used the object
returned by derivingConversionRef() to create a new ProjectedCRS. While doing
so, this caused the derivingConversion of the original object to have its
targetCRS set to the object returned by normalizeForVisualization() and similar.
If that object died, then the weak pointer would be reset, and the original
ProjectedCRS() has now its derivingConversionRef()->targetCRS() nullptr
So bottom line is use derivingConversion() for anything that is not pure
reading !!!
This is confirmed to be the fix for the QGIS scenario in
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/30569#issuecomment-540060919
In QGIS use case, the issue arised when using a projected CRS with a non-GIS
friendly axis (that is where normalizeForVisualization() created a new projectedCRS)
|
|
proj_create_conversion_pole_rotation_grib_convention() to address GRIB datasets using a pole rotation method
|
|
faithful serialization of the geoid_geog_crs parameter of proj_create_vertical_crs_ex()
|