From c8c3f0bec38a643a3d7391213b6dbc99363d75e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Limkilde Svendsen Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:59:05 +0200 Subject: Fix typos in geodesic doc --- docs/source/geodesic.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/source') diff --git a/docs/source/geodesic.rst b/docs/source/geodesic.rst index c7753404..11bb5e5c 100644 --- a/docs/source/geodesic.rst +++ b/docs/source/geodesic.rst @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ The routines also calculate several other quantities of interest On a flat surface, we have :math:`m_{12}=s_{12}`. * :math:`M_{12}` and :math:`M_{21}` are geodesic scales. If two geodesics are parallel at point 1 and separated by a small distance - :\math`dt`, then they are separated by a distance :math:`M_{12}\,dt` at + :math:`dt`, then they are separated by a distance :math:`M_{12}\,dt` at point 2. :math:`M_{21}` is defined similarly (with the geodesics being parallel to one another at point 2). :math:`M_{12}` and :math:`M_{21}` are dimensionless quantities. On a flat surface, @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ areas is based on :cite:`Danielsen1989`. These improve on the work of :cite:`Vincenty1975` in the following respects: * The results are accurate to round-off for terrestrial ellipsoids (the - error in the distance is less then 15 nanometers, compared to 0.1 mm + error in the distance is less than 15 nanometers, compared to 0.1 mm for Vincenty). * The solution of the inverse problem is always found. (Vincenty's method fails to converge for nearly antipodal points.) -- cgit v1.2.3