From c5d8c0862f3a368abfd10ca81676baaa0df8ea91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Even Rouault Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 20:37:00 +0100 Subject: Update docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst Co-Authored-By: Kristian Evers --- docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst b/docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst index 6f0bf386..85cbfa09 100644 --- a/docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst +++ b/docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ If one forces the datum hub to be considered to be EPSG:4326, ones gets: Those operations are less accurate, since WGS 84 is assumed to be equivalent to GDA2020 with an accuracy of 4 metre. This is an instance demonstrating that using -systematically the WGS 84 hub can be sub-optimal. +WGS 84 as a hub systematically can be sub-optimal. There are still situations where the attempt to find a hub CRS does not work, because there is no such hub. This can occur for example when transforming from -- cgit v1.2.3