aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/plot/plot.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCharles Karney <charles.karney@sri.com>2020-10-26 16:06:19 -0400
committerCharles Karney <charles.karney@sri.com>2020-10-26 16:06:19 -0400
commit1081e496a0fc7e45c6eb4703b0fc402bf2a9e945 (patch)
tree46c57750e8f94ab20a5b61403935723ee3d50417 /docs/plot/plot.py
parent6c2363e88f8eb86e1331b3dc5f05897436ad9c43 (diff)
downloadPROJ-1081e496a0fc7e45c6eb4703b0fc402bf2a9e945.tar.gz
PROJ-1081e496a0fc7e45c6eb4703b0fc402bf2a9e945.zip
lcc.cpp: fix abs -> fabs
Also some corrected information... Timing UPDATED -------------- Sorry the previous timing data was wrong. Here are corrected values.. Here's what I get with g++ -O3 on two Linux machines with recent versions of g++. As always, you should take these with a grain of salt. Times per call in ns = nanoseconds. Fedora 31 Ubuntu 18 g++-9.3.1 g++-7.5.0 fwd inv fwd inv old merc 207 461 217 522 new merc 228 457 168 410 etmerc 212 196 174 147 The new forward method is the 10% slower (resp 20% faster) on Fedora 31 (resp Ubuntu 18). The new inverse method is the same speed (resp 20% faster) on Fedora 31 (resp Ubuntu 18). Roughly speaking the speed comparison is a wash. Maybe we should pay attention more to the Fedora 31 results since these are with a newer version of the compiler. I would still make the argument that a 20% time penalty (which in a full PROJ pipeline would probably be no more than a 5% penalty) would be a worthwhile price to pay for a more robust implementation of the projection.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/plot/plot.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions