aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/plot/plot.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEven Rouault <even.rouault@spatialys.com>2020-05-16 17:41:12 +0200
committerEven Rouault <even.rouault@spatialys.com>2020-05-16 17:49:26 +0200
commitce38ade494db73ab27dbdbdab84332e4530c8d8a (patch)
tree8f75422d2fc98f5fa7b7b17493879b3ca4cb50e1 /docs/plot/plot.py
parent2d6b5c0a9a1e0f0f92e69c641a16377ef36f8270 (diff)
downloadPROJ-ce38ade494db73ab27dbdbdab84332e4530c8d8a.tar.gz
PROJ-ce38ade494db73ab27dbdbdab84332e4530c8d8a.zip
peirce_q: limit input to positive latitudes
Otherwise it returns junk (negative latitudes are mapped to the same location as positive latitudes) I'm a bit confused by PROJ peirce_q implementation. Looking at the projection of the world, it looks like this matches the diamond formulation of the right map shown at https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/map/projections/peirce-quincuncial.htm, but limited to the inner square of this diamond (which corresponds to the northern hemisphere). We lack the 4 triangles on left, top, right and bottom for the southern hemisphere. Furthermore, this formulation of peirce_q does not seem to have the quincuncial property of the square formulation (left images of the above ESRI doc), or the one at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peirce_quincuncial_projection ...
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/plot/plot.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions