aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartijn Visser <mgvisser@gmail.com>2021-01-17 11:57:39 +0100
committerMartijn Visser <mgvisser@gmail.com>2021-01-17 11:57:39 +0100
commit169ccbb7a0a4d64a300f111d38e1e25bddbd5182 (patch)
treeb3f00362a652d1b7ea35bbe4a974f6b0d6acb0cb /docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst
parent1e7f6c68bfb54727b855533ad00ed335b092f56a (diff)
downloadPROJ-169ccbb7a0a4d64a300f111d38e1e25bddbd5182.tar.gz
PROJ-169ccbb7a0a4d64a300f111d38e1e25bddbd5182.zip
fix a few typos in the docs
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst')
-rw-r--r--docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst b/docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst
index f1453257..af177f6c 100644
--- a/docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst
+++ b/docs/source/operations/operations_computation.rst
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ This document is meant as a plain text explanation of the code for developers,
but also as a in-depth examination of what happens under the hood for curious PROJ
users. It is important to keep in mind that it is not meant to be the ultimate
source of truth of how coordinate operations should be computed. There are clearly
-implementation choices and compromises that can be questionned.
+implementation choices and compromises that can be questioned.
Let us start with an example to research operations between the NAD27 and NAD83
geographic CRS:
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ must be retained or discarded:
The sorting algorithm determines the order of relevance of the operations we got.
A comparison function compares pair of operations to determine which of the
-two is the most releavant. This is implemented by the :cpp:func:`operator ()`
+two is the most relevant. This is implemented by the :cpp:func:`operator ()`
method of the SortFunction structure.
When comparing two operations, the following criteria are used. The tests are
performed in the order they are listed below:
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ In a number of situations, the source and/or target CRS do not have an identifie
The first step is to try to find in the ``proj.db`` a CRS of the same nature of
the CRS to identify and whose name exactly matches the one provided to the
:c:func:`createOperations` method. If there is exactly one match and that the CRS are
-"computationnaly" equivalent, then use the code of the CRS for further computations.
+"computationally" equivalent, then use the code of the CRS for further computations.
If this search did not succeed, or if the previous case with known CRS identifiers
did not result in matches in the database, the search will be based on the
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ one can define a geographic 2D CRS (latitude, longitude), a geographic 3D crs
case, the EPSG dataset has also included two extra definitions corresponding to a
longitude, latitude, [ellipsoidal height] coordinate system, as found in the official
French IGNF registry. This IGNF registry has also definitions for a geographic 2D
-CRS (with an extra subtelty with an entry using decimal degree as unit and another
+CRS (with an extra subtlety with an entry using decimal degree as unit and another
one degree-minute-second), geographic 3D and geocentric.
For EPSG:6258, there are 7 matching (non-deprecated) geodetic CRSs: